Thursday, December 20, 2018


                                                           Who Are the Angels?

If we had a full answer to this question, we would not have to ask it. But not knowing clearly,
prompts us to investigate who they might be. Some things we know and so we have to build on that.
But many things are left to our imagination. 

The following are things we know by Scripture, human experience, or insight;
      They are intelligent, usually using human language.
      They are from somewhere else.
       They come to humans for a purpose.
       There are good angels and bad angels.
       They can communicate to humans and are interested in human life.
        They relate to ultimate good or bad authority- God or the devil.
        They do not seem to respect gravity or inertia.
        They approach humans on their own interest or mission
         They might come by human request.
        They may take a physical form and be visible.
        Their presence may be clear whether they are experienced physically, emotionally, or spiritually.
        They may identify themselves or may not.
         They may appear to persons as a person or be incognito as far as being angelic or from God.
         Angels are only one way God communicates a message.
         They do not explain their usual place of existence.
          They may be known by their message more than by their form.
          Children have their own guardian angel according to Jesus.

What more we might imagine:
         They may be “extra-terrestrial, from another planet or place in space
         They may have movement possibilities that are different from anything we know on earth.
         They may have knowledge of earthlings not limited by physical connection.
          They relate for reasons of their own, which earthlings may not be aware of.
         They may be infinitely more intelligent than us.
          They may be present far more, in fact, more continuously than we have any concept of.
          They have a different mentality than humans which we would only have to guess about.
           Some may be from a “place or planet” where sin had not come. 
           They may be able to change the form of their being at will, e.g. physical vs spiritual, etc.
           They may not be confined to space and time as humans are.
           We do not know if their knowledge is limited or omniscient like God.
          They may be unlimited in number or limited.
          They maybe from eternity or in time.
           Whether adults have a literal personal guardian angel or just one when needed.

Monday, December 17, 2018


                                                    Where Am I – and Going?

Having written most of my biography and perhaps still having, who knows, how much of my life ahead of me, how could I possibly write the last chapter of my life? I may have 15 to 20% of my life ahead of me, or much less. It is something I often guess about. Knowing a bit about statistics, yet aware that statistics are only averages, I have no indication of where I will be in contributing to longevity statistics. Yet I gather that I am more likely to have between 5 and 10 years left than 15-20 years, considering that I am at 81 and a half presently as Christmas approaches this year. Thus I am interested in writing a present stance without much of any guess how much time I have left.  If I follow one ancestor, I would have about 19 years. But her husband, well I am already 11 years past his demisal age.  So here I am and where I am going as far as I can guess.

I am keenly aware that I have a bit less strength and motivation for activity than 5 years ago, yet I feel that in most ways I am still very much, almost totally, the same person as I always was. It's an easy deception to think I still am who I always was. Most marked of this ambiguity is that I think that it should be so easy to do something like repairing the house or working on a rental property, yet I don't want to to it for reasons I can't justify. It seems I am lazy, contrary to my life long view of myself and unacceptable to my ego. So I am sitting uncomfortable in a no man's land of feelings and motivation vs obvious abilities.

There is also another ambiguity of how old I really am. People knowing my chronological age can easily classify me among the old people, Yet to myself I never got there. I am still practically where I always was. I frequently have to double check on how people see me and who I really am. It is rather complicated because some treat me socially nearly as if I was “normal” just like them. Or am I deceiving myself in thinking so? It come down to the fact that I don't really know who I am, or how old I am supposed to be. It seems I am caught in a self-image of being between a little old and actually old. Is there something like middle old age? If that is a category, I will tolerate myself thinking so.
.
A third ambiguity of my age is that I never had any speed bumps on the way- no point of change like a disability where I had a reason for acting old..No health problem that slowed me down. Not even a retirement age threshold. Perhaps the biggest jolt was moving from Belize in 2011, but even that move was gradual over period of years where we just stayed longer each year until we did not go back any more. It just documents that I have little gauge to show where I am as I have no idea when and how I got here- except one thing- I didn't die on the way. Perhaps death will also not happen at one point; we just gradually fade away. Not too bad a way to go.  Tongue in check? Perhaps slightly.

So here I am in aging. Where, I really have little handle on. I just know I have some excuse for being a little less active which people are willing to grant me. I also have less motivation for expanding my life, like investments and updating our house beyond minimum upkeep. Even having a real garden is a little too much. Mowing the lawn is OK- for the summer. Winters I look out and watch the snow falling, and sit in my study reading and daydream like at this writing. O yes, all my other writing that I am trying to manage and preserve for another generation and many generations, so they know who was here for a while. So where am I going?

Judging from the past 15 years I am going nowhere fast, but then not assured of the opposite either. Yet there are no clear health bases for thinking anything is going to shift rapidly in my life. Any abrupt change in health would be a departure from  my past style. Yet I have little assurance that the future might not be much different from the past. We have often prayed that our final years would be without great dependency. At least that is in my mind when we pray for health all our days. May God grant it.

Tuesday, October 30, 2018


SEVENTY OR EIGHTY THINGS FOR WHICH LIFE IS TOO SHORT


Life is too short...

1. To complain about your spouse’s housekeeping when you can just as well do it yourself.

2. To wash the dishes 3 times a day, unless you have visitors, free labor, like children or grandchildren, if it is only you and your spouse.

3. To try being a millionaire by working or striving.

4. To worry about what you don’t get done in a day.

5. To keep up with changing fashions when classics are always in style and dignity.

6. To wash your car every week.

7. To do 115% on a menial job when 95% of perfection will do well and in half the time.

8. To make children do things your way when it is not a matter of morality, safety, or efficiency.

9. To spend a day without reading God’s word, a newspaper, and some pages in a good book.

10. To lie in bed when you can’t sleep when you can get up and do something significant.

11. To quarrel with your spouse just to win an argument.

12. To be distracted by grudges longer than 60 seconds.

13. To wear yourself out so you can rest or take a vacation.

14. To live for yourself, even if you tithe your money.

15. To skip a day without prayer.

16. To maintain an acre of lawn.

17. To worry about yesterday or tomorrow.

18. To neglect your family for anything.

19. To take everything seriously, especially your own opinions.

20. To worry about your failing faculties.

21. To remake your spouse or anyone else into your image.

22. To ignore a child’s cry for love and withhold support and a hug. .

23. To lavish love on yourself with selfish entertainment such as TV when there is someone right there to love, like a child trying to crawl onto your lap, begging for your attention.

24. To make excuses when the real reason is, you just don’t care enough to act.

25. To live the unexamined life.

26. To hesitate when the obvious is before you.

27. To wait to enjoy your family until they are a bit older

28. To watch programs like Feed the Children and World Vision, and grow old when others can’t because you only watched the programs and did nothing about it. .

29. To mope over your failed dreams when you can pray and let God do it a better way.

30. To strive after wealth which does not satisfy.

31. To put off until tomorrow to do the good you should have done yesterday or today.

32. To wait for a better day to share the good news of Jesus.

33. To live without priorities and goals.

34. To lose sleep over what might have been rather than considering insomnia a gift of God for fellowship with Him.

35. To worry about the rainy days at the end of life.

36. To grow older with desperate needs around us and delay in doing anything about them.

37. To repay a fraction of our debt to God for his habitual goodness to us.

38. To live for the day you can retire.

39. To hope you will feel more like helping the poor tomorrow
40. To stop sowing good deeds until you see the fruit of your work.

41. To let secret sins stifle your faithful service to God.

42. To stay depressed over strained relationships.

43. To take a long summer vacation ever year when you need only half that amount to touch base with family and church to rejuvenate.

44. To stand there buttoning a long shirt front when you’re chaffing at the bit to get on with life.

45. To let months and years slide by without filling them with activity of eternal consequences.

46. To allow other’s negativism to get under your skin and hinder your service to God.

47. To take a long vacation when you are restless to be immersed in meaningful activity of service that is waiting for you.

48. To let marriage difficulties hang and not seeking understanding and resolution.
49. To live with personal moral dilemmas and bondage.

50. To let would be visitors wait at the door just because you have had enough visitors for a day.

51. To worry in the night about matters you know you can solve better by sunlight.

52. To neglect hobbies involving nature and the great outdoors by which you can share God’s joy of creation.

53. To be ignorant and unobservant and miss half the show of life.

54. To be concerned only with news and not reflect the meaning of happenings

55. To let another year go by and not be 365 days ahead of the past.

56. To remember, record, and photograph every interesting and special thing that happens.

57. To memorize all your ancestral connections back to your original immigrant, unless it comes easily.

58. To limit yourself to one culture when the world is full of colorful and curious cultures.

59. To coast along in the life span with only your own age group and ignore the energy and optimism of youth and the wisdom and contentment of the elderly.
60. To follow one’s own plans and miss the best way of God

61. To lie awake at night idly thinking when one could be up and doing something constructive in the environment of the home, the mind, or God.

62. To be patient with an unconstructive or unfruitful life.

63. To retire from life before God takes you away.

64. To start doing something good until you have it all figured out and everyone approves.

65. To save for a rainy day when it is flooding all around you right now in the global village.

66. To only look back without a vision for the future.

67. To see the years slip by without knowing what happened. (What did happen, anyway?)

68. To have any hobby that consumes a great deal of time before you are in wheel chair.

69. To spend most of your life making payments on your house.

70. To spend any more time dreaming up more of these philosophical ideas.
      
UPDATED AT 80 YEARS

71  Spend half your earning life paying off the house you live in.

72. Spend more years of pursuing education than you will find useful in your life.

73 To wait to really know your children until they are grown up.

74.To spend long weeks just to make a better living.

75. To wait until you are secure financially to find out what was really God's plan for your life.
     
76. To neglect learning to enjoy nature as God's wonderful home meant for you and everyone.
     
 77.To give second place to God when you expect to spend eternity with him.

78. To fail to show personal love to your spouse every day. (if you marry)

 79. To not observe how your parents went before you into their aging years; you will be there before you realize what happened.

  80. To realize how short life really is until it is almost gone.


Sunday, October 28, 2018


               7 Things Happy Couples Do Daily

1.        Kiss- to boost your self-esteem

2.                 Hug- to decrease stress

3.                 Listen- to build trust

4.                 Cuddle- to boost your immune system

5.                 Forgive- to clear negative energy

6.                 Laugh- to boost intimacy

7.                 Say “I love you”- to live long together

      These 7 things are small actions but will deeply
       strengthen relationships when done daily.

      From “Power of Positivity"                     


Sunday, October 21, 2018


                                                      Is God All We Need?                                            

I am a bit uneasy when we sing songs that affirm that God is all we need. It seems to be saying on the surface that God himself is our only support and commitment in whom we have total faith, which seems pious and devoted to God. But it seems to ignore we have needs that are met through God's ways and not through him alone in praise, worship or trust and commitment. Let's explore how God has set up the support we all need which may not be from him directly as the songs seem to assume and imply.

When God made man and placed him in the Garden of Eden, man's relationship to God was free and unspoiled and we assume they talked to each other freely. Yet God said that it was not good for the man to be alone by himself; and so he made a woman to be his counterpart to fill a need he had created in man. It wasn't enough for God to be God with a perfect relationship with man. Man needed a person next to him who was more like himself.

It also was not enough for the couple to have each other. They needed to have the joy of creativity God had created in them. Thus God enabled them to have children. So he fulfilled the nature of his own creativity by that ennoblement of sex and procreation. .

He also placed them in the Garden. They needed an environment. He set it up and then they were to care for it themselves.  Ever since then man has been caring and perfecting his environment so that today we have cities, houses, and many beautiful things. People shape their setting at more than necessity because of their need for perfection in their environment, more as God had created for them.

So more than man being sufficient in relating to God, he also needed a human element for completion of his needs, and the ability to reproduce. Then further, the drive to create the best world he could to live in. Man was not satisfied and still isn't content to just have a relationship with God, even though restored in Jesus. Christians as well are never satisfied with just having God, as if he met all their needs and interests, as some of their songs may imply or idealize. God wanted more for man then simply being man’s only support, to be satisfied with only a relationship with him. So he created him with many ways related to his fellow humans and environment. We need a lot! That is how God made us. Is that why we try to come back and sing that all we really need is God?  Kind of an over-correction. Perhaps it would be more correct to sing that God provides a way for all our needs, and be ever grateful for that.

Monday, October 8, 2018


                                             What is Salvation (For)?

It seems to me salvation in the Christian faith may be emphasized in 3 or 4 ways. Individuals, congregations and denomination emphasize one or more of these ways which follow the tradition of any of these groups. While we cannot insist that only one is correct, it seems to me we should be reminded to examine what our options are and see if we as believers should consider if our emphasis of salvation corresponds to Jesus' life, teaching, and the life of the early church and NT writings.

A basic meaning of salvation is to be saved from our sins and sinful life with its consequences. Some churches emphasize this aspect so that every service must help persons in the audience to know how to be saved and to having an “invitation” for persons to make a public stand- perhaps literally for Christ and repentant from sin. This is to ACCEPT Jesus as Lord and Savior. The point here is that while this is certainly important, it  is only one option of emphasis to experience salvation.

A second option is to assume that the church's main public stance on salvation is to worship. When we are in corporate worship or in personal ”devotions” we worship him with thanksgiving and surrender ourselves to him  This may be the stance of the saved, at whatever level of understanding or maturity the worshiper has come to at any point. Commitment is assumed but not focused on. To give God the glory is the meaning and chief expression of our salvation.

A third focus may to be a part of a fellowship and a commitment to that fellowship and to live out the Christian life in the cooperate life of the church. Believers have so much in common, and their commitment to each other and the establishment of faith is paramount to salvation. The Amish may be the best example of this concept of salvation. Unity is very important and pattern and specificity is an expression of them of being saved. Yet assurance of salvation is not important, in this understanding but being a loyal obedient church member is the best one can do, trusting God for our eventual salvation. When you join the church as a member, you are moving toward full salvation by God's grace. 

A fourth understanding of salvation and expression is seen in working out one's love to God and commitment to him by being in service in the world. The goal is for all people in the world to know God's love and accept the life and faith which we have from our Lord Jesus. If “God so loved the world that he gave his only son” then the highest repression of being children of God is to give ourselves in love to the world so that they “will not be lost but have eternal life. The typical expressions of this nature of salvation are in witness, missions, and service to humanity. It is expressed in the belief of being “saved to serve” as the basic expressions of our salvation. If you can keep your salvation to yourself, it is very narrow and self-centered and hardly real.

These four options of chief emphases are not mutually exclusive  but illustrated so that a choice can be made on how we may best express the meaning of salvation as we find it in the teachings of Jesus, the “Acts of the Apostles and the NT writings. The forth option, which is the most drastic for the church and believers, assumes all the others, but spells out a perspective  that makes the other come in line to accompany the Salvation of the world which is the central function of the church in the pattern of God's love for the world. All of the first 3 expressions of salvation are supportive to the end purpose of God in saving us. We are not saved just for own sake or to have a good life in the fellowship of the church, but to carry out the purpose of God in sending Jesus into the world- to save the world.
     
When one seeks to help the church really be saved and live out salvation in the fourth dimension, it soon becomes evident that the church need to be greatly overhauled in all its expressions and functions. Worship is affected.. Preaching is different. The outlook on the world is different. Is the best we can do to just shift emphasis gradually? When someone affirmed our years of service in Belize, I responded that we were only doing what everyone should be doing, only in another place. This writing is to set us to thinking what salvation is and what we are saved for. This needs much exploration 

Thursday, August 16, 2018


                                                         Clingy or Mature?

Sometimes it seems to me that people express a feeling that is considered holy, or faithful of trusting in God and clinging tightly to him for every step of their lives. This seems to me to be the position of child who feels insecure unless she has hold of the hand of a parent. Or a child that is comfortable only when in the arms of his mother. While this may seem pious as a matter of devotion to God, it seems to me, perhaps as an older man, that it is a somewhat immature position for a Christian.

A person learns a whole lot in life on the will of God, whether or not he feels the hand of God. God is always there. God has given us much knowledge of his ways and will for the lives of his children. He keeps on giving wisdom, to use that knowledge, in the pursuits of our daily lives. An example is that of this morning, as we were contemplating sending money to a family in Belize that had contacted us for help. In fact, two single mothers had requested help in the past day. What to do in light of bills here that are due early next week and we do not have money for all that and any good amount of money for the needs of our friends in Belize. What we decide to do, depends on our knowledge of these situations and wisdom, and our yieldedness to do what we feel in their best interests and in our situation. Certainly we could borrow money to meet all present needs and requests. But is that what we should do?

It would be easiest if God would just tell us plainly without question what do in many situations in life. Then we would know! But has he not given us a mind to use, and many experiences to draw on, as well as the counseling of others when needed? Somehow, it seems God just doesn't want to make all decisions for us, even though he certainly could and could communicate the best answer to us if he would desire. Many people want to have some kind of hotline to heaven, some sign of knowing God's will, perhaps a feeling in the body, or even the “heart”. Doing what feels right. This may be good, but at times we have found that we still ended up where we would not have want to come to. For us, to have a sizable home equity loan plus credit cards ,now with elevated interest- we certainly would not have chosen quite this place in our finances, had we seen everything 10-15 years ago.

I have wondered sometimes, if God led us, how did we get into this situation? It is part of being human, to us to follow our convictions and common sense, which may still get us into unenviable situations. My confidence is that even if we get ourselves into any wilderness of uncertainty in the paths we choose, we can still depend on a faithful God who will always be watching over us. It wasn't that we should have fearfully clung closer to his hands, but that we can venture forth in the way he has called us and then be confident that he will never desert us. Thus we can use the experiences we have in a life of walking along side God, or following Christ, and discerning the way to go by the wisdom of the Holy Spirit within us. We are free to venture forth into the world, confident that God will always be within reach and protecting us in his ways for us. Perhaps he will not make everything clear or sensible to us, but certainly he will never desert us as we trust him maturely as we follow him in all of life as we venture forth in the light of our experiences and knowledge.


Friday, August 3, 2018


                                            HOW WE BUY (Or How We Decide As Couples)

There are three criteria that persons use in deciding what to buy on any item: Quality, economy, and aesthetics. Take clothes for example. When you buy pants or a sweater, or what ever. Are you most concerned about how long it will wear, or how attractive it is, or how much it will cost? Certainly there is usually a combination of interests in the three criteria. For some persons, one will dominate where as for another person a different one will be most important. It will also depend on what you are buying. If a woman is buying a dress, how it looks is dominate usually with durability and cost secondarily. If a man is buying work pants, durability ranks above attractiveness usually, with cost also important. But buying a car may find a couple divided on what to buy: to buy something economical to use, or in fashion? Or does the record of repairs of such a model matter, or the present condition of the car matter a lot?

Which criteria prevails or dominates is also dependent greatly on parental influence and personal interests and probably often gender. If your parents came through the Great Depression and you grew up under that mentality and memory, economy may be very important in most things. Perhaps initial costs may be more important than durability as survival in the short run was the focus in their day. Aesthetics had little influence in those days of practical survival.

Economics has another influence when there is plenty of money around. Sufficiency allows for cultivation of aesthetics. For example, when there is money lying around, one can buy tasty food (aesthetics) beyond practical nutrition, (quality). One can also excel in various arts of music, entertainment, and art. Here durability technological quality may be as important as aesthetics if money is no problem.

From these examples, it is easy to see why a husband and wife may have difficulty in shopping together. There are of course gender differences in styles of shopping: the wife is likely to shop aesthetically,  while the man will cling to his purse [economy] except when he wants to buy something. Window shopping may be appealing to a woman’s aesthetic interests, but when she likes something, costs may appear to take back seat to the husband who may not have the same aesthetic taste or interest. The wife may want to buy something for him also for which he senses no need as he measures needs by still durable materials in his possessions, and not as much by now nice something new may be. However gender generalities are not consistent.

It is likely that some couples may compromise buying in order to “keep peace in the family.” The husband may be content to spend more on eye glass frames and his preference on durability may take back seat to her aesthetics. She may also allow him to buy used clothes at Goodwill- if they don’t look too bad by her tastes, although she would like him to buy new stuff. Yet sometimes compromises are not that simple if they hold different criteria strongly. If he feels their budget is strained, he may object strongly to her buying something for aesthetics sake beyond quality and necessity. For the woman, necessity may be spelled psychological- the need to do something for her self, which to the husband may be a category incomprehensible. Then the strength of wills may prevail before a decision is made. It helps to be understanding. 

Saturday, July 21, 2018


                                             ME AND BROTHER NORMAN
                                                       (From my biography)

Brother Norman was my teacher at Clinton Christian Day School the first three years of that school's existence and my last three years of school. It was his first teaching job. I remember how he stood before us on that first day and told us with a little nervousness, that he was a new teacher. He was friendly, down to earth, and a serious Christian which showed every day. Friendly yes, but not a buddy. He was the teacher, and his friendly dignity never broke down.

He told us only a little of his family, being one of 15 children in Montana, far out West. He was married to a local young woman. But I new little more. I knew that he became a deacon at some time. He was a Mennonite and I was Amish, so we met little outside of school functions.

I remember how he could prod students to study. He was consistent in a memory program of Scripture. Every Monday he would assign a group of verses. These we practiced during the week and by Friday we wrote them. There would be anything from 5 to 14 verses. We memorize the book of I John and the 4 chapters of Romans- 5-8. The longest stretch for a week was John 1:1-14. Then there were many other individual verses. Did we memorize the Sermon on the Mount? I don’t know, but it has always been very familiar. It did not seem laborious for me.

But there was one thing I could never memorize. When he asked us to memorize the circulation of the blood in the human body, I was staggered, and said I could never learn that. Everybody else I suppose, learned to say it, but I was the last and then needed some help to get through. What the difference was with that and Scriptures, I don’t know, except what I put my heart to, I could do, but not what I didn’t feel able, was impossible.

Brother Norman had a way of saying something that would always stick with me. Some were sayings like, “Wait (weight) is what broke the wagon down”, (possibly as an antidote to causing delay) which I repeated to my children for years before they fully comprehended it. He always said that there are always two alternatives to every problem, something I recalled many times when my family thought there was not even one way out of a dilemma. He even claimed that he can prove that a hill was a lazy dog: “a slow [p] up.”

He had other ways to make a point. One time when I had trouble getting to class after recess, he had me and another student with the same problem write an essay on “Choice, Not Chance, Determines Human Destiny” I don’t know whether the other student took that seriously, but I did and wrote up a page of my thesis. He had a reason for making me do it.

One time, perhaps soon after the above essay, as I wrote before, I’m not sure, he summoned me into the office and asked me point blank, “Are you a Christian?” I was probably about 15 at the time. It didn’t help him to say that I hope so, or wanted to be. He
wanted to know if I WAS then; or to make me think on that issue. I don’t remember how that conversation turned out but I never forgot the question. He had that kind of concern and when I responded then at Brunk Brother Revival invitation, about that time, I knew the salvation Scriptures a little better than the person ascribed to help me reach a conclusion. Brother Norman was really concerned about important matters.

So he was also concerned about self-control. When I discovered a girl sitting near me in the class room who was willing to listen to me anytime I said something, he noticed that. He had us stay in one recess and allowed us to talk all we wanted, which wasn’t nearly as much fun as in school time. I suppose his watchful eye spoiled everything!

Brother Norman really fostered a love of music in many of us. He led in chorus practice and in many school programs. He noticed my harmony singing and once asked several of us to sing a song for the group to help them hear what it should sound like. We sang many kinds of music, of course all religious. He made hymn singing enjoyable for all.

After I quit school after the ninth grade, I still asked to accompany the class on a trip to Kentucky and he allowed me to go. I enjoyed that for many reasons including that by then I already admired Loretta and it didn’t exactly please Brother Norman that I wanted to be around her, like for traveling or when ever it came up. I don’t remember any details of his displeasure, only that he wasn’t very comfortable. After all, I was no longer in school and I made it awkward for him to do much about me.

I always admired Brother Norman for his persistent tutorage and concern for me both in my education and Spiritual development. His character was so consistently Christian and his dedication to teaching so clear. It was then a bit of a disappointment that when I left school, I also lost familiar contact with him. When we would see each other at school functions, I admired him more than he considered me a special person. He was special to me. Perhaps I was a problem to him some times, or he couldn’t be close to all his students. But to me he was a noble mentor, one of the most significant teachers I had in my first nine years. I will always remember Brother Norman as one who went before me when I needed a model for my life.


Monday, July 16, 2018


                                                             TOO MUCH HELP?*

It seems that from a long time, people have been very helpful in giving me information and guidance in abundance. From the time my mother gave me endless instructions on right behavior, and tried her best to cull out misbehavior, down to my retirement years when my wife is constantly pointing out my misspeaking and misjudgments, I have had an array of endless assistance in going down the path of prudence and wisdom, let alone practical directions. Recently I have been mulling over this phenomenon of my life and tried to understand just what might be behind all this.

It may just be that I have been surrounded by people who really care about me, far beyond what many people experience. My mother tried to show her love by trying to make me an obedient and decent boy. She tried so hard, my sisters once agreed privately to each other that I was the one who received more spankings than any of the other children, topping out all 9 siblings. Why she singled me out for this concern is beyond me. It was the same in school, not with spanking, but with teachers who were desperate to keep me from expressing my thoughts and feelings privately during the class hour. Once a teacher kept me and an attractive girl in at recess time and said we can talk all we wanted to. It was not nearly as fun as it should have been, for some reason. It seems they always had me in their watchful eye. As a married person I worked in a factory where I was also surrounded by people who gave me a lot of attention. They observed my work, and urged me to “work a little faster if you can stand it”. They tried to help me be a super worker, a drive that has never fully left me. And as we as a family would be on the road, sometimes my wife would watch the road more carefully than I, telling me when I was catching up with the car in front of us; or when pausing at a stop sign, telling me there was a car coming down the road just as I was starting up after surveying both directions. Who knows the accidents she spared us from by her constant co-watching traffic and the road for us, noticing even if I drove too close to the center of the road, or the edge. One just can’t have too much caring help in such dangerous ventures as driving on roads fraught with all kinds of potential pitfalls. Yes, I have always been surrounded with a multitude of caring people to assure that I would survive securely to a ripe old age in the best of shape.

Another reason for receiving such an abundance of help in my life may simply be that I take life so casually. Few things were hard for me, whether studying, building a house, graduating from college, supervising supper for a dozen kids, or minding my own business. Driving a car was a more common thing to me than riding a bicycle as an adult, and much easier. It was just automatic, sitting there, talking, and hands lightly on the wheel. Once I discovered on a family trip in the Wild West, that our station wagon could hold the road for over a mile, with my hands actually only inches above from the steering wheel. My fingers were right there, but not close enough for some family members. My son told me recently that I was careless, not minding to things carefully. Probably often I could not have cared less about focusing on something that I had done a thousand times, and knew exactly how carefully I had to be to make things come out in a way satisfactory to me. Ah, there’s the rub; while others spent 110% of the time necessary to do something perfectly, I do a 98% job in half the time. Like sweeping the living room rug, which with a bunch of kids around will look the same in an hour, whether I do things my way, or others spend twice as much time on the job. Life is too short to do a perfect job on only half the things that should be done. Better do all that needs doing at 98% perfection than half at super perfection. Or I recall how my teens felt I was not very excited when they were facing crises with no way out as they saw it. I just remembered a teacher who taught us that there were always two choices in everything. Just sit down and think, and choose the best solution. That I why I never faced a crises as a dead end; there are always two ways out, even out of this life. So, many people not knowing that life can be taken casually, and we can accomplish far more by concentrating and considering the essential next moves; or the cost-effective way of work, or job, more than getting all steamed up about minute details, they think I just take things too casually and want to help me in ways not really necessary.

There may be a third reason people have been so helpful. Besides seeming so casual, I also appear very vulnerable and defenseless. I don’t project myself ostensibly or pretentiously; I am just me- confident, quiet, and a very safe person to help. I appear somewhat easy to heap help on, needed or not. Most people want to help the helpless and vulnerable. It makes them feel good to help the weak, and besides, there is that satisfaction of being benevolent. It also makes people feel one up on the person helped. So appearing vulnerable to help, it is safe, gratifying, and gaining self esteem to do something good for those like myself who appear weak, helpless, and vulnerable.

These are some of the reasons people may have offered me so much help in my life. Some just care so much; some mistake my confidence and casual approach to life as careless, and some find it is safe and gratifying to help me as I will not be able to defend myself against their help- which, taken all together, is just a little too much help.

*Hint: Take this essay with a half grain of salt.

Friday, June 29, 2018



                                              AMERICAN CHRISTIANITY 2009

A bit like the Athenians that St. Paul met, it seems to me that American Christians that I have been meeting and worship with lately are very religious and concerned about their relationship with God and whether they are growing in closeness to God. But I wonder, are they hearing anything from God of importance? What seems to me to be lacking is what I am most concerned about presently for myself, perhaps related to our leaving Belize where we had full time ministry opportunities among people needing something from God and us. I wonder very much, what is the heart of God desiring of his people, and me in particular? If I could sense the heart of God when he looks at me- that is what I am seeking after and wishing for others. It is not enough for Christians to be buried in commitments- socially, churchly, financially, in business or in this culture, and not seeking to know first the heart of God in our lives. What would please God the most from us? What is he longing for us to do? What should be the preoccupation of the church, any church?

It seems the biggest problem for Christians around me is that culture and commitments have so swallowed them up that they are not really free to seek the heart of God. People just can’t respond to anything that does not fit their present style and pace. They must first go and “bury their fathers” that is, putting off seeking the heart of God fully because they are wrapped up in the culture and their commitments that must be fulfilled. An economic standard of living dictated by society and our commitment to it is one big rock that weighs down many. They have little freedom to move with God’s heart leading them. Another is the assumption that they are already doing closely what God desires of them. Who would hear it if God would call them to a life of ignoring cultural economic values, (becoming a bit like the poor, for the sake of the Gospel) and perhaps considering geographic displacement? How many would respond to God’s revealed heart to rearrange their whole economic assumptions so that they could share half their wealth so that hundreds of millions could simple eat and hear the Gospel? I suppose most Christians could not imagine that God would desire anything like of them; and if he did, it would be impossible to respond to such a call. What would it take to revolutionize the church structures so that the adequate resources God gave the church for the salvation of the world would be released to meet those needs? When will worship and the church, cocooned now by culture, welcome the heart of God to break through to hear God’s design for humanity?                                                                                                          July 8, 2009



                                 LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF

When Jesus was asked by the rich young man what he must do to get eternal life, Matthew 19:12-22, Jesus listed some of the commandments and also, loving your neighbor as yourself. Certainly this was a personal challenge for personal salvation. But what about the salvation of the church- any congregation? What if a congregation was challenged to love its neighbors as itself in order to inherit eternal life? Now the church must ask, “Who are the neighbors of the church?” People may prefer to keep the question local. But when the needs from around the world vividly and repeatedly break through on our big TV screens, there is a whole new dimension to neighborhood compared to when Jesus was on earth. Is not the neighbor anyone whom you see in desperate need? Do not the orphans and all people around the world who have never had a chance to hear the Gospel become our neighbors? The neighbor becomes all people who have the need to experience the whole Gospel.

But back to the church faced with the global neighbor. What concern is the church challenged to have if it loves the ‘neighbor as itself’. Literally it would mean that the church has an equal responsibility to care for the ‘neighbor’ as for itself. Is it too bold to suggest that it might mean to share in equal measure in its prayer, financial, and personnel resources with the world neighbor? If so, a church would spend a lot of time and focus thinking about the needy neighbors around the world, just as it does on its local internal needs. One could ask how much the church is really giving to God’s wider kingdom goals when most of the financial and other resources are simply spent on taking care of its own needs. We pay for a comfortable environment so we can worship and fellowship with each others. The leadership is our servant and we pay them for their services- services to us. Churches have many miscellaneous items in their budgets. Is it really giving an offering to God when most is for our own benefit? Are we not really loving ourselves much more than the neighbor?

A congregation would be faced immediately on how it could help the global neighbor as much as itself. The answer is simpler on paper than in logistics: either cut local expenses or double giving through the church, or a combination of both. Certainly they would still need to meet the needs of the neighbors among themselves locally. They could not be ignored in favor for the neighbor abroad although the church would need to recognize the likely greater desperation of the neighbor around the world.

Remember, this was part of Jesus’ answer to the question of how to get eternal life. He spelled out the condition “if you want to be perfect”, of selling and giving to the poor [neighbor]. Is it too much to say that the church’s inclination to hoard resources leads Spiritual discontent- to “sadness” like it did for the young man rather than to the “perfection” with real happiness? Where does it fit in that God loves a cheerful [hilarious] giver? That sure is a long way from the uneasy church, or perhaps the church does not know how happy it could be if they would follow Jesus’ radical challenge to love the global neighbor like itself.                                                                                          August, 2009


Tuesday, June 19, 2018


                                                        The Family Constellation

There were 10 children born to Elam and Eliza Hochstetler, of whom I was the sixth, following 3 boys and 2 girls. There were alternately boy/girl until I broke the order; I would have been a girl by the “established” order. The first 6 were also spaced two years apart plus a few days or weeks. Let's look at each one of the siblings, especially as they related to me in the family constellation. Two have been referred to elsewhere and will receive minimum attention here.

Laban was the firstborn, 10 years my senior. He was the model child, something of the standard for each of us. He was well discipline and rather quiet of speech. He was almost grown up when I was a child. He left home to work on a farm at 18 in connection with the military draft, having a conscientious exemption from that draft. He would return home each weekend and returning Monday mornings by bicycle; I remember one such parting in which he entreated me to be a good boy while he was gone, whether he felt it necessary, or just in doing his part in encouraging me as he would be inclined.

Miriam was next. She was always around, although it seems I remember her a bit less. A helper around the home and caring for the younger siblings was her life. It seems she loved music and youth associations like any teenager. I recall a songbook she had of collected songs, some secular, like “Just Thirteen Steps Away”, songs which I learned from her. She had a boyfriend Lee, for quite a while but then quit. She served in various voluntary service locations such as Brooklane Farm in Maryland and then Loman, Minnesota where she met her husband to be Harvey Graber. Later they served as missionaries in Red Lake, Ontario for 5 years and then Brazil for 10 years.*

Samuel was next. He was an active young person growing up without much interaction with me that I can recall, no doubt blending into the family without much notice. I do recall he broke his arm once, which was considered resulting from being slow to do his duty in work. While I had always considered him to be a conventional youth, he took the initiative several years after marriage,  to pack up his family of two little boys and move to Virginia to participate in starting an outreach church. He became the leader and three sons became church leaders as well.

Esther was next. She was a friendly reaching-out person to me, perhaps at time more personal than I was comfortable with. She was very religious and devout. I still recall her mouthing her own praying when the family prayed as at meal time. Her untimely death after being on the mission field in Canada for 27 years was a shocker for the whole family while we were in Belize.

Daniel was my next older brother, with whom I had the most interaction in my childhood. This is noted in the essay, “Closeup: Me and Daniel.” Without doubt, he was the model for me, going before me as I was growing up, giving me many cues what to do and avoid.

Rhoda, two years after me was the sibling I never knew as she died before I was 3. Yet that loss no doubt heavily affected my emotional formation as it was in deep grief of my mother that I grew in my pre-school years. This was multiplied by my mother's loss of a sister and her father in the same years. Though I do not remember Rhoda, they say I felt deeply about her when they buried her, me not understanding death at all.

Marietta, written as Mary Etta in her childhood, followed Rhoda and breaking the timing of one child every two years. Mom felt she was a replacement for Rhoda. For reasons I can only guess, it seems I was in conflict with her more than any other siblings and the tendency gave me a bad reputation as a naughty boy which was likely justified. I know I found fault with her at her eating at meal time and was sometimes told “You look onto your on plate!”

Walter followed. We called him Sonny for some years and although he was 7 years my junior, we had a lot of fun together. I gave him the pet name “Valdensah” (Waldensian” )  He was intelligent and creative, whether in music or with his playthings. It seems I introduced him to musical theory and notes  In his imaginary playing earlier, he would line up furniture castors which he call horses or cows.

Joe, always Joseph as a child, concluded the family. Ten years younger, he was a favorite child and brother. It seems when he was young I could swing him up and he could stand on my shoulders with help. He was active in the family in spite of being a follower. I recall when at the supper table when everyone was telling little stories and he wanted to be there as well, He said, “Just think of it, I don't like bones!” (Denk mole draw, ich gliech nat g'nocha!)

Even living a more simple life on the farm, we children found ways of interacting and playing games together. In the summer we could play outside such games as dare base, hide and seek, tag. Sometimes we played such games with cousins our age. We were discouraged in playing “Monopoly”-  too materialistic?? although checker s was acceptable and even chess. But reading was a favorite. No recorded music- well no electricity. Sometimes as family we would sing together. I believe we all could “carry a tune” before we went to school. While it seems we were not close as siblings, we were taught to respect each other in language and interactions. It is remarkable that we remained close to each other in our life-time and all the more as we aged. Even choosing different church denominations has not separated us from a sense of closeness. I do not know of any family quarrels or frictions over the years. The family estate was also disposed of without any conflict and we kept a family woods for posterity where we gather every Memorial day with our ever-expanding families.


*One time Miriam, Dad, and God saved our house from burning down.  During breakfast one morning she went out to the milk house by the barn to bring in more milk for breakfast. As she headed back to the house, she suddenly saw fire or smoke coming from the door of the wash house that was attached to the house. Most likely screaming and running as fast as she could, she alerted us all. The older children carried water from the nearby pump house tank and brought it to Dad who poured pail after pail against the wall behind the water tub that was being heated up for washing clothes. I took a bucket to the wash room by the kitchen and pumped as fast as I could and also handed the buckets to Dad for putting out the fire. I don’t know how long it took but eventually it was under control and then put out. The charred walls were a reminder for the rest of our time living there that we were saved by the timing and cooperation of the whole family. God’s timing. A few minutes later would have been too late. No phone or fire truck would have reached us in time.

Sunday, June 3, 2018

                                                      Nicknames for Our Children

Some things seem so trivial yet they are or were a part of our past which we might forget and probably just as well so. Yet trivia is cultivated frequently for whatever reason a person might indulge in it. Certainly so with pet or nicknames for our children. I suppose it is indicative of the "pet" nature of our relationships with those little ones. In our case, none of the names persisted into adulthood and phased out somewhere in childhood or early youth. It is impossible to remember 40+ years later which were important or endured long, so I will just begin with the oldest and go down the line. (Actually, I still mutter the first two nicknames in the privacy of our home at times!)

Paul, I called Saulos, which is the German and Greek name for Paul. Or Saulos Natan, again fully the German translation. It had no special significance, but just reflected the languages I knew and reflected a playful variety of what we had officially named him. Natan is also Hebrew for gift. Possibly Saulos is something like 'little' in one of those languages

Conrad, I called Kunraut, which was also the German form, at least so I thought. There was of course a Conrad Grebel, an early Anabaptist leader that I admired, from whom preference was originally derived. Probably Grebel was also German.

Grace, that is a longer story. Apparently one time Loretta was reading the story of Jack and the Beanstalk that greatly interested Grace. In enthusiasm for the story, she said "Beanstalk" excitedly. So that became her pet name. But she had another name as well, Bumper Crop. Whether this reflected her plump build at birth and childhood, or the fact that she followed so closely after Conrad I don't know. Certainly we could not always just call this vibrant young child by such a calm name as Grace.

Rachel, Why I called her Beanert is beyond me. She was also one of our precious children who could not have only one beautiful name, but had to have a play name for all the times I enjoyed so much to play her with me while I was going to college and reserved my evenings for my children..

Then there was Julie, who was named after the rising star, Julie Andrews who I was enamored with in the days of The Sound Of Music. But J. Andrews had also starred in My Fair Lady and sang, "wouldn't it be loverly". Did loverly metamorphose into Aberly? or just Aber.  I don't know, but that is what I called our Julie.  Julie Aber. And I could repeat that variation to the closing lines of Anderew's song, where I sang the name 4 times: Aberly, Aberly,Aberly, Aberly.

I don't remember If only I used these names but it seems primarily I did; Loretta remembers calling Rachel, "Rachel Baby". I hardly know if the children used the same names I did, but I know there were one or two names for each other, but about pet names, I suppose that was primarily my thing. Those kids were just a lot more to me than their legal names, however much we liked them.
                               

Tuesday, May 15, 2018


                                                God, All We Can Imagine and More

The intellectual genius Stephen Hawkins who was also an agnostic or atheist who died in the past year, was once ask what he would say if he actually did meet God and was asked by God why he did not believe in him . He said he would say, “ Lack of evidence” I feel he was stone-blind to all the evidence that there is a real God.

If there is a universe, it must have come from somewhere at some time. It could not have self-created itself as Hawkins tried to imagine. That takes much more faith than I have. The necessity of a Creator for a universe is logically incontrovertible. In itself it may not appear to define the nature of a creating God, until we examine the nature of the universe and the challenge of creating it when there was nothing there to make it from. When I learn that nuclear power comes from turning matter into energy, I wonder if it follows that energy can also be turned into matter, Although this would require an infinite amount of energy to create a universe of the dimensions of what we have. It would point to a God that has energy that is infinite beyond our imagination.

It has been calculated by science that the universe must be 3.5 or 3.8 billion years old, judging from the distance of the most far light coming from somewhere until it would come to us here. One could well ask if that is any measurement of a universe or beyond the reach of light to our universe. So the size of the universe in the widest sense of the word is totally beyond our understanding. One could also imagine in the size of the universe (‘s), what was happening before God decided that there should be one. Was God from eternity meditating and planning on the shape of this universal project for a billion trillion years? He would have had time for that!

It is interesting how He used a variety of materials and to make the universe. We know about electrons and protons and I don’t know much about all the other elements of an atom. The number of elements or arrangements and number pf particles are also numerous. Seems there were about 100 elements known when I was young and more have been discovered since. Must have been His creative leisure to play with these little “things” in so many arrangements. I wonder if there might not also be other and more elements than are known to scientists. What limit might be exist for God?

I am intrigued by God’s appreciation for the aesthetics as I have written elsewhere. It seems he made many things like color, sound, ecstasy, taste and other luxuries for the pleasure of humans beyond necessity for life. Must be like him to enjoy many things just because he could make them in his creative imagination. Think of the variety of plants and animals. Books are written on animal life with its infinite variety, and new ones are still being discovered. From insects that seem intelligent to animals that are almost human, each is capable of activities that bogle the mind.

We know about human emotions of which there are a great variety. But more mysterious are the emotions of animals of which we see only a glimpse.  Just today I saw a video of a dog in a swimming pool which could not get out. Another dog paced above him trying to find a way to help the miserable dog in the water. Finally that safe dog jumped in the water and came behind the struggling dog and pushed him up so he could get out. Sympathy, hatred, affectionate response to human emotions, like horses may remember that bad attitude a persons had hours before when the person now comes with a good attitude. It seems likely that animals have many emotions we understand so little. Even more amazing is some evidence that plants as well have feelings and some may detect friendly or hostel attitudes of humans passing by. Or plants that may communicate through roots to neighboring plants that the soil is dry and that neighboring plants should direct there root to a more favorable direction.

I am not a scientist, and wish I could document these and many more examples of wide spread feelings and communication between many fauna and flora. With the imagination we have, no doubt in the image of God, one wonders if not other living thing also have imagination comparable to ours. In fact, is it not possible that many species have a confidence that they also are made in the image of God? Is it outrageous to think that God may just as well communicate with many others of his beings? They fact that we can communicate a little with such animals as horses and dogs, and they can grasp some of our vocabulary, why would God not want to communicate with many of his other intelligent fauna and flora? One can speculate whether other species have also strayed from their Creator’s intent like man and God had to become special to redeem them. Feels like I am far out by now in my imagination. Perhaps far beyond the capacity of the most people. But if I can imagine it, is it not possible that a lot more is true than we assume and can be sure of? Why would man be the only creature who has a right to claim to be in the image of God and in a relationship? God loves us so much we feel special, but why would not others of creation also feel special? I can imagine it; why might it not be true?

I have not said anything here about God and the stuff we call inanimate. How do we know electrons don’t join together and have feeling- or even intelligence? Why would God only relate intelligently to so-called animate beings, a category we smart one have concocted?  Doesn’t all this mean that we most likely know only a miniscule amount of what actually exists about God and his relationship with the universe?  I would desire to be open to a greater understanding of who God is and how he relates to the world and the universe. I have no doubt that our understanding of God is extremely provincial or narrow minded, limited by the understanding of our scientific mentality. I believe we will all have many surprises when we finally see God in heaven as he really is. I doubt that we can even then grasp his infinity of nature, but it doesn’t hurt to start trying here and now, which I had tried to do here. Worship our great God with your own imagination. 



Friday, May 11, 2018


                                              The Roselawn Years, 1970-83

After I graduated from seminary in 1970, I was invited to visit Roselawn Mennonite Church in Elkhart and to preach as a way of the members learning to know me in consideration as pastor. Their previous pastor had been there for many years and it was considered they should have a new pastor and so they looked to the seminary for possibilities. They decided they want us to come and so after about a month, they asked me to start pastoring. 

We were still living in Goshen and so we commuted until we moved to Elkhart on Modrell Avenue.. We had looked around for proper housing and then found this place less than a mile from the church building. A old lady, Mrs. Fredrickson, wanted to sell the place after her husband had died. As we considered that the price of $14,000 was reasonable, we bought it at her price. She wanted to stay living in a little house on the lot and renting it from us. She gave us $50.00 per month and we made payments of $110.00 so we had to fork out only a net of $60 per month which was good for us. It was on a lot of over an acre so it was very nice for us for gardening, trees, and lawn. We moved around Thanksgiving Day and the children had to change schools in the middle of the semester. The house was a bit small for us and the boys had to sleep downstairs where the ceiling was low- at least for me, but then still ok for them. The girls had a room off the living room, kind of a sun room with a good closet.

I suppose the ministry went all right for me for a while, but within a year or two, it was somewhat obvious that some of the members expectations were a bit different from my own. The pastor was supposed to be the Spiritual leader and the congregation was organized to do the business of the church. The pastor was to be something of an invisible inspiration for the church as far as the mission of the church was concerned, but not as an administrator. I grew up where the leaders made most decisions for the church and then at Walnut hill, it was very democratic, at least based on member consensus and making decisions. But Roselawn had a church council that made most decisions and the pastor was on about every committee but without an administrative role. This may be confusing to the reader, but it also was for me and I probably did not understand all this for many years, possibly until I moved on from that church. Also the original members who had started the church were still there and were 10-20 years my senior. They knew how things should go and probably never thought any other way existed. Or was proper. Anyway, I preached and did what I thought was proper.

After I was there about a year, we became aware of a movement of the Spirit, commonly known as the Charismatic Movement. Some of the members went to Notre Dame and attended classes of “Life in the Spirit” in that Catholic setting. A few times we also attended their prayer and praise meetings. At the same time we also visited the Zion Chapel fellowship between Goshen and Elkhart for their Charismatic worship services which included a lot of singing, testimonies, and sometimes prophesying in tongues or English. One couple from Roselawn, the Chupps were very much into this and the wife had received a tremendous healing from depression that had been a real trial in their marriage. After she gave her testimony in a Roselawn meeting, we asked her husband what he thought about her testimony. He simply said, “I have a new wife.” One time we were at a meeting at the Chupps with Vic Hildebrand who was leader of Zion Chapel. He explained a lot about the Spirit and prayed for all who wanted it. He also asked if I wanted him to pray for the Baptism of the Spirit. I had been asking him questions all evening, and here it was after midnight. I said I wanted what ever God wanted to give me, so he prayed for me to receive the Baptism. It was about 2:30 until we got to bed that night. No, I did not speak in tongues as they likely hoped I would. But early the next morning, possibly before 6:00, I was wide awake and over in my study looking over many Scriptures about the Holy Spirit. Now it seemed to me that it all made sense the way it had been explained the night before. I had studied all my life and in seminary, but considered the miracles of the Spirit were for “those days”, rather than today. Now I saw the possibilities that there was a new thing that was real for our day. The next days and weeks I was reading a lot about the Spirit. I was also working for Ralph Miler on a house up close to Tri Lakes Church by the lake. It was a time of such closeness with God, not of my compulsion, but by God's initiative that then in those days I first spoke in tongues, probably in the evening at home in a quiet way alone. I did not tell Loretta for a few days and then when I did, she had no problems with it. I was careful not to speak in tongues as a thing of myself but only when I felt God was leading me lest it be a thing of my concoction rather than that of the Spirit.

I suppose my ministry was affected although I was cautious about talking about it a lot. I did preach 4 sermons in a row on the work of the Holy Spirit in our lives but never recommended that everyone seek the Baptism of the Spirit. There were only a few who were really talking about it, for example both Chupp families- Earnest and Elmer's. Eventually Elmer's left the church as we were not moving forward as they thought we should. They felt we should strongly preach and advocate the Charismatic teaching and experience. There was new life in our fellowship. We prayed for the son of one couple, who was into drugs and within a week he perked up Spiritually and became a Christian. Soon he was helping to lead the worship with guitar and praise songs for part of the worship time as we also continued singing the regular hymns.

It seems this spiritual movement was one matter that divided the church in my ministry. Some members wanted me to move faster Charismatically and others felt the church was going backward under my ministry. When my first term of 3 years was up, I told the leaders that I do not want to continue in ministry. Oddly, I cannot remember what we did in the months following, but we must have attended other churches regularly with our family. I was depressed, feeling that God had lead me into this ministry and now I was unable to fulfill it. I certainly felt in a maze of personal direction.

About this time I was once visiting at some neighbors a block south of our house. Here was a woman who was drinking and had been thrown out of the house she had been renting. Not knowing better, I brought her home and she stayed with us for the night. The next morning I showed her about becoming a Christian and she was ready. After I prayed for her and she also prayed, she just sat there and shook all over with laughter of relief from her problems. But her problems were not all over. Several times when she got her welfare check she marched out the door and spent several days and her money drinking. When she would come back she would feel that she had lost everything when she drank, but I told her to get up and walk again. Once Loretta pursued her on the bicycle and tried to stop her when she was rushing to drink after she had her check but to no avail. Eventually she was in a nursing home and stayed sober while she was there.

Other things were also happening at the same time we were away from Roselawn. Probably related to my work in a factory I had pinched nerves or carpel tunnel syndrome in both wrists. My wrists hurt excruciatingly and I could not sleep for several nights. I would pace the floor for about ten minutes and then lay down for 5 minutes, all night long. At one time my fingers hurt so much I asked Loretta to spread my bread. I remember once running out into the back yard in agony crying out to God, feeling an identity with all the suffering people of the world. When we took Marge, the lady with the drinking problem, to an apartment looking for a place to live, I could not sit in the car waiting for Loretta to check things out with her, but had to get out and paced the sidewalks in pain. After some days either I was tired enough to sleep, or the pain subsided a bit; I was able to sleep again some although I recall earlier, first sitting up in bed and throwing myself back in agony. I was learning some lessons in suffering although what was I supposed to learn?

During this time, there was also extra stress on Paul. He had started school at Bethany and they called us telling us to come to the school for him as he could not quite function in studying. I don't believe he was making a disturbance but he was restless and couldn't concentrate on his studying, He was talking a lot when we brought him home and while most made sense, his mind was going faster than he could link things together. We took him to Oaklawn Center for evaluation and they recommended he be hospitalize for treatment.

About that time I began working at Elkhart General Hospital as an orderly. My hands were some better but I felt I could not go back to factory work even though I could hardly afford working at the hospital for lower wages. Paul was at the hospital about four weeks when I started working there and was released, only to be admitted again for another 4 weeks. After he was released he got along ok at home on medication and went back to school, although at Elkhart Central High at first.

I felt comfortable with my work at the hospital which included a variety of activities and allowed me to interact with patients who were sick. Sometimes I told them that I knew what suffering was as I had such terrible pain in my hands. I transported patients to x-ray or surgery, and other places. Sometimes I was on patient care as a nurse aid, making beds, bathing patients, feeding those unable to feed themselves and helping them walk or exercise after surgery or in recovery. I worked there about 6 years before my course changed.

After away from Roselawn Church for several months I had a sense that I might be going back to Roselawn. I was not surprised when John Steiner, a well-known minister, came to our house and invited me to come back to Roselawn on a team with Wendell Yoder and him. I consented and was then on a team for 6 years, although Steiner soon faded away from our team. Wendell and I were very different from each other. I was a trained teacher with a listening ear. He was a persuader in preaching and I let him lead in most of the administrative leadership which was not my strong gift. We met weekly over breakfast and discussed our work and how we would divide our work, for example who we would be visiting.

Perhaps about a year after I began working at the hospital, about in 1975, we felt our house was small for our growing up family. We all agreed that Loretta could work and I could add to our house. She was able to get a good job at the hospital in the nursery which suited her fine, having had 5 babies herself. Daughter Grace was then 13 and with her we learned to cook, especially supper as Loretta worked the evening shift. I continued working at the hospital, sometimes part time, as I built the split-level three bedrooms at the end of our house.. Sometimes she and I were on the same hospital shift and sometimes I only saw her for the half hour our shifts over lapped. At first I didn't mind being separated from her but eventually I got really tired of being alone from her 5 evenings a week.

One thing we did over the years was attending the big church wide meetings with our family. Once we went to Ontario for a meeting and also to Niagara Falls. On the way we saw a dog crossing the highway and then looking back, saw a car flipping over with the people flying out, one person dying there. Apparently they tried to miss the dog that had also crossed the road in front of us. We also went to a conference on the Holy Spirit in Virginia about 1971, and to Estes Park in Colorado about 1978. As we hardly expected our children would always be with us, we bought a big station wagon and build a box on top of it and made a real trip out of it. We were in Manitou Springs, CO for about a week and went to Pike's Peak, the Royal Gorge, and other places before camping at Estes Park for the national assembly of the church. Our children who were becoming teens enjoyed these travelings and would meet youth from other states sometimes repeatedly. It was also a test of whether we could all get along together in close living out of the car for a time.

Once we went to Chicago for a one day outing and on returning we drove though heavy rain and hydro-planed at turnpike speed. When I told the family that I could not control the car, they were all praying, “God help us.” He did and we stopped safely, sliding sideways and one tire going flat in the skid on the rough berm. It was testimony time that next Sunday in church that God saved our family. The car that had flipped not long before was in the back of our minds- where one person had died.

One theme that has persisted throughout our life has been that of the need to use our money carefully. This was true whether we had more or less income. Probably the Roselawn years were the times of most continuous need to spend carefully. One reason was the income from pastoring half time coupled with what I could make with the other part-time job was less than I could have earned in a full time job or profession. Even with both of us working at the Hospital, the combined income was not exactly comfortable. Yet we never missed a due bill because of lack of finances that I can recall. Part of this was that in most limited circumstances, I would write down all our upcoming expenses and date them as to when they needed to be paid. Sometimes I had a list, who knows now, of ten to fifteen items from house payments to utilities, to credit cards (yes) and other miscellaneous expenses. Then I would pay them in the order they had to be paid to avoid late fees. 

It is also likely that in the years of our teens and related private high school expenses we likely had more expenses in the 70”s than any other time in our life. Fortunately, our children all helped with their own jobs and helped in buying their own clothes as well as what they wanted. They all had paper routes at some time and also all worked at fast food places or restaurants at some time. This helped us as well as gave them some experience in frugal and wise spending of limited resources, or whatever. There was a time when I would borrow from my children and then pay back when I received my pay check. At one time we even borrowed and just kept track of what I borrowed. Yet I doubt that they ever suffered nutritionally or medically or of any other necessity. God was always good even though it was inconvenient many times.

I suppose our parent/teen relations were quite normal or average, what ever should be considered as such. I clearly remember that I used to think that each or most of the children had a time of withdrawal from us in which they wanted to be more independent from us. It seemed to me that I was more tolerant than Loretta in expecting them to want to make their own decisions. We trusted them a lot. Probably I never accused any of our children of lying as I did not want them to think that I would even faintly expect that of them. No doubt they never told us every thing they did when they were away from home or in high school years. When it was difficult for them to appreciate church services, we insisted that they attended at least one Sunday service. If they had to work at a food place on Sunday, we tolerated that although it was not often and certainly not as we were raised. I feel we were fairly lenient and liberal with our children compared to how many parents today feel they need to guide their children. We probably grew up in a more simple and rural environment where parents could more easily grant freedoms to their children. It seemed when each of our children had gone through enough independence, they would come back and relate to us again more closely. I could think of many examples of the above items for our children, but I do not wish to name anyone. Any grandchildren can ask their parents how they got along with their parents, of where the trouble spots were.

In January 1978, we had our house fire. A traumatic, new, and life changing event. I was working at the hospital when I got the news and a secretary took me home- driving so slowly like she was in a funeral procession! Well. Cars were lined up as we came near our house. Smoke was coming from the house when I first saw it. Firemen did not know how to get at the base of the fire as it was all smoke filled, but it seemed to be mostly at the kitchen end of the house. I kicked in the basement door so they could work at it from there. They finally had it under control and then out. My study floor had burned out and the dining room floor sagged. The refrigerator had fallen down. The inside was one mass of smoke covered. Herbie the dog tried to survive in a closet and succumbed. Hardly any furniture was salvageable except the dining room table. All my college texts were badly smoked or charred as well as most my educational notes. A solid shelf of many translations of the Bible were gone as well as many slides and cassettes. Loretta and I sifted through the debris of my study in the basement for days to find slides, coins or what ever. It was a very dirty and smelly/smokey situation. It seemed that my study was the place of most damage which suggested it may had started from an electrical box which was downstairs below that room. The next day our church had already collected $1,000 to help us move along with new emergency expenses.

It was winter when the house burned. We lived over at brother Daniel's house and the blizzard of the decade followed close. Nine kids in the house, cousins and siblings. We made it somehow. Staying in Goshen, I had to drive Road 33 which was down to one lane. I stayed at the hospital one night so I could be there the next day as many had trouble getting to work. When we moved into the Fremont house after a week or two, we had hardly over a pick up truck load of stuff. . When we moved out a year later, we had much more. I don't remember where we got our beds and stuff. 

The insurance appraisers had come in just a few days. They considered the house a total loss except for that dining room table which was an antique that could be refinished. So we collected the whole amount for which it was insured, $17,000 minus that $100.00 table. Our first impulse was to buy another house and fix this one up in time. But a Realtor said there was no way to go looking for a house in that snowbound situation, which is how we then rented a house on Fremont house. Instead, in a few weeks we bought two 3-bedroom rentals on 728-732 West Garfield for $3,000 down on land contract. As I remember. I went part time at the hospital and spent as much time as I could repairing the house. We put in a new kitchen, two bathrooms, and made a study where the dining room had been, rearranging most of the old part. There was much sheet rock to replace and everything had to be painted with stain sealer to cover up the smoke scent. In just about a year we had it finished enough to move back in.

At the Fremont house, Conrad asked if a long-time friend, John Metzger, from Goshen could move in with us. With the house crowded a bit, I said he could if he wants to share the space. So he was with us and then moved over to our Modrell house when we moved back. John was at Bethany High School with our children. In his industrial arts class he built a big oak water bed which they also moved into the downstairs boys' room. Later John got a good job in furniture making and married a Christian girl, rising well above the malfunction of his family.

By 1980 it was again time to re-consider my role at Roselawn. I would have gladly quit and someone else take my place. But the church had such trouble deciding what to do that I finally offered to continue if they wanted me to. So they approved that and I continued for three more years. Wendell had left to work in another church so I was alone then as pastor. During that time I took real estate courses and became a broker, at the worst time as interest was very high and it was hard to sell houses. I also did home health care, helping people who needed just a little help like making meals, bathing and house sitting with them.

During those three years at Roselawn there were more changes in our family life. Conrad and Janet were married in 1980. Ron and Grace in 1982 and Bruce and Rachel in 1983. Conrad learned to know Bruce and Janet from work at Ponderosa. At some time, Bruce had moved in with us and thus became acquainted with Rachel. But earlier, Rachel had been in Belize in a Goshen College study/service trimester. In those three years when I was away from the church community I would sometimes think of other places where I could serve just as well.  In about May, 1983, we had Harold and Janice Gingrich at Roselawn for renewal meetings and also the church had an evaluation of my ministry. All these together: Rachel in Belize writing back interesting matters, the Gingrich presence, and the ambiguous ministry evaluation, led me to think this would be a good time to move on. So I terminated at that time at the end of the term in late 1983. I envisioned I would most likely serve as pastor in another church.  Meanwhile I got a job in a trailer factory. ( And bought the house at 1031 Middlebury Street on a tax sale for $825.00.) But Belize stayed in my mind and when we went to Virginia for the wedding of my niece Marilyn and Steve Schrock in May 1984 we stopped at Eastern Mennonite Mission in Pennsylvania and expressed an interest in Belize. Miriam Book who met us was so enthused about our interest that it made quite an impression on us and we wondered if God was calling us to Belize. Meanwhile, we had discovered Tri Lakes Chapel and became members there and soon I was an elder there. It was a most rewarding fellowship after we had visited other churches for about 9 months, making a survey of practices of the churches to be better aware of the styles and nature of other Mennonite churches. Once we visited Tri Lakes, we knew that was our church for then and stopped visiting other churches. But a new life lay before us that would change our lives forever as well as that of many others: Belize.